Re: IANA Considerations
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IANA Considerations

> >  Ned, you have not produced any argument for this position, and since
> >  the absence of such a section does not imply the absence of IANA
> >  considerations, your logic continues to escape me.
> >
>  Repeating for about the fourth time...


Here's my own take:

It is empty bureaucracy.  It is form, without content.  It is additional
effort, with no benefit.

It is reasonable and necessary to require that documents contain
important considerations.  This is not accomplished by having pro forma
sections lacking content.

  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.