Re: IESG intends to publish conflicting RfCs causing loss of legit e-mails

["william(at)elan.net" <william at elan.net>]

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Ted Hardie wrote:

> Hi Frank,
> 	This is one of the issues that the IESG believes is at
> the heart of concerns about using them in tandem.  Your message
> highlights, though, that one of the statements in the IESG note
> got dropped accidentally.  The original said: "the IESG
> believes that documenting the different approaches does less harm
> than not documenting them."

Can I ask you then to comment in light of the following paragraph from RFC2026:

|  (d)  Limited Use:  The TS is considered to be appropriate for use
|      only in limited or unique circumstances.  For example, the usage
|      of a protocol with the "Experimental" designation should generally
|      be limited to those actively involved with the experiment

on what form is taken to limit those involved to only those who have 
agreed to participate in SID experiment and similarly on how is that
done for SPF experiment?

Also can I ask IESG to resolve my misunderstanding on if it is considered
ok for EXPERIMENTAL RFC to be incompatible with existing standard-track 
RFCs for any internet-wide experiment?

Lastly, I would like a clarification on if you expect any of these 
experimental proposals to go forward in the future for standard track 
publication based on result of the experiment?

Looking forward to your answers,

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william at elan.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf