Re: Protocol Action: 'Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)' to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Protocol Action: 'Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)' to Proposed Standard



 In your previous mail you wrote:

   The IESG has approved the following document:
   
   - 'Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) '
      <draft-ietf-tls-psk-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard
   
=> this document seems to go in the wrong way: pre-shared secrets
are known to be weaker than certificates and TLS has already many
problems with its misuses (for instance no client verification or
poor server certificate validation).
 I remember a similar discussion about IKEv2 but in this case pre-shared
secrets were kept for compatibility... I can't see why no argument
against pre-shared secrets applies for the TLS case. Perhaps a security area
director can help me? BTW, I don't buy the "limited CPU power" argument
without real world examples.

Regards

Francis.Dupont at enst-bretagne.fr

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.