Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
Hans Kruse wrote:
...
but otherwise I _cannot_ see how the _content_ of the option could harm a device that does not want to deal with it.
If it interferes with congestion management elsewhere along the path, it can potentially damage
every other packet stream. This is a *very* complex discussion of course.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
