Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:39:37 -0400
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com>
Message-ID: <p0620070ebee8c42a0174 at [10.0.0.171]>
| The arguments against what the IESG has done seem,
| mostly, to be that we should have gotten IETF consensus before
| making a decision.
That is absolutely not it.
The argument is that the IESG used the wrong criteria in making
their own decision.
kre
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
