Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]

And I apologize for having nothing whatsoever to say about spamops, killfiles, or steering.


as well you should.

"we" will let it slide this time, Mr. Dawkins.

but don't let it happen again.

--

d/

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 +1.408.246.8253
 dcrocker  a t ...
 WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
  - From: Scott Bradner
- Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
  - From: Margaret Wasserman
- Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
  - From: Hans Kruse
- Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Should the IESG manage or not?
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Should the IESG rule or not?
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]
  - From: Spencer Dawkins

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.