Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]



On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:02:29AM -0400, Ken Carlberg wrote:
> My view is that your impression of the reaction is incorrect.  in
> taking the position that respondents can be classified as either: 
> a) being satisfied with the IESG *decision*, b) dissatisfied or 
> uncomfortable with the decision, or c) could not be clearly 
> determined by the content of their response, I came up with the 
> following list.

You can add me into the "Satisified" column".  Note that sampling
messages posted to ietf at ietf.org on this list will almost certainly be
biased, since it is the people who are disasstified which are likely
going to be the ones complaining aobut it.

						- Ted

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.