![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:02:29AM -0400, Ken Carlberg wrote: > My view is that your impression of the reaction is incorrect. in > taking the position that respondents can be classified as either: > a) being satisfied with the IESG *decision*, b) dissatisfied or > uncomfortable with the decision, or c) could not be clearly > determined by the content of their response, I came up with the > following list. You can add me into the "Satisified" column". Note that sampling messages posted to ietf at ietf.org on this list will almost certainly be biased, since it is the people who are disasstified which are likely going to be the ones complaining aobut it. - Ted _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.