Re: draft-klensin-iana-reg-policy (Re: S stands for Steering)

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-klensin-iana-reg-policy (Re: S stands for Steering)
From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Some participants in this discussion have contributed WAY too many
times.  One result is that their arguments waver between repetitive
and nonsensical.

Bob Braden

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
Next by Date: Re: I'm not going to listen to this any more.
Previous by thread: unsubscriber
Next by thread: Re: Should the IESG rule or not? and all that...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: draft-klensin-iana-reg-policy (Re: S stands for Steering)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.