Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]

["JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com>]

At 01:43 02/07/2005, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0200, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
> > The list of "satisfied" is of ne real interest. The list of "disatistied"
> > seem important enough to say there is no consensus.
>
> No IETF consensus is required to accept or deny a registration for the
> registry in question under the current rules; instead IESG approval is
> required instead.

Agreed. But the question is now "does IETF think IESG was right". There is 
no consensus. We should therefore stop arguing on HPH and get a more 
peacefull and general debate. I prefer the "we have a generic problem" 
approach to "you are dumb stupid to have (not) adopted that, because of RFC 
n1 to nx". ...

> And if there is no consensus, then there is also no consensus to
> change RFC 2780, under which auspices the IESG acted....

It seems it is a second problem which could be addressed after the general one.
all the best.
jfc


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf