Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)



Pete Resnick wrote:
...

Personally, I find nothing in 2026 which indicates "in the best interests of the IETF and the Internet" as a criteria for the IESG to evaluate much of anything. And I think that is part of the concern you are hearing expressed in the objections to the decision process.



However, BCP 95 is fairly clear:

  1. Mission Statement

    The goal of the IETF is to make the Internet work better.

and I presume that the IESG is expected to steer accordingly.

    Brian


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.