 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:39:37 -0400 From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com> Message-ID: <p0620070ebee8c42a0174 at [10.0.0.171]>
| The arguments against what the IESG has done seem, | mostly, to be that we should have gotten IETF consensus before
| making a decision.
That is absolutely not it.
The argument is that the IESG used the wrong criteria in making their own decision.
Since neither 2434 nor 2780 lays down any criteria, I don't understand how to measure "wrong."
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.