Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?]

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

Robert Elz wrote:
...
> Also remember that "no consensus" in an issue like this, really needs to
> mean "no authority" - if you cannot get at least most of the community to
> agree with the IESG position, then the IESG cannot just claim the
> authority and say "there is no consensus that we should not have it".

I don't believe that is true in this case, as long as RFC 2780 is in force.
Especially since there is a clear path for Larry Roberts to ask for
IETF consensus, which by definition would overrule the IESG.

    Brian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf