![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Keith Moore wrote:
> If IESG people were to personally benefit from their exercise
> of this "privilege" you'd have a valid gripe. But I don't
> recall ever seeing this happen. If it does happen, I don't
> think it happens very often.
Publishing mutually exclusive experimental RfCs simultaneously,
the first saying "abuses NOT RECOMENDED", the second saying
"SHOULD abuse the first", you say that this was a first case ?
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.