![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Joe, > > It seems like such [IANA] considerations are, by definition, relevant only for > standards-track RFCs. It is not useful to require it for other documents. I think you're correct in general but this is not always the case. Consider URI schemes. I think they're often informational, and in general I see no reason to be otherwise. Eliot _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.