![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> External reviews are what I'm favoring - external, independent reviews. so when IESG provides the external review, that's bad, but when someone else does external review, that's good? I disagree. part of IESG's purpose is to do review from a broad perspective. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.