Re: I-D ACTION:draft-klensin-iana-reg-policy-00.txt

["JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com>]

At 17:23 14/07/2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Since we don't have a WG for this, the IETF list is the only place
> right now.
> Brian

I would recommand a WG. This would permit to have a merge of the current 
propositions, to engage into more complex issues such as:

- compatibility with externally defined elements (ex. ISO 3166 discussed in 
RFC 1591)
- political disclaimer when a registry may be construed as a support for a 
political, commercial or technical vision.
- experimentation
- registry system architecture and generic registry solution
- multilingual support in spite of the current state of the art technology 
limitations
- harmonisation with ISO 11179, inter-registry relations
- transition from namespace towards ASCII non dependent codespaces
- distributed registries, relations with private or experimental/temporary 
registries, registries specialised restrictions
- reporting on registries updates and corrections
- registry managers committees selections
- updates via Working Group RFCs
etc.

jfc 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf