Re: Seeking reviewers for language tag registry docs in WG last call

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; <ietf at ietf.org>
> Cc: <icar at ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Seeking reviewers for language tag registry docs in WG last call
>
> I am glad Randy Preshun now joins my call for additional expertise. This
> Draft is particular: due to its political, cultural and commercial
> implications, and their possible impact on the IETF, what is to be
> considered is probably more what is not in the Draft than the technical
> constraints introduced by the Draft, where I consider that we should simplify.
>
> A first list of questions is under http://rfc3066.org/review.htm. Readers
> should also address these questions. They are important enough to be
> considered carefully, with an open mind. IMHO they call for a dedicated
> document providing a clear, stable, politically protected IETF framework.
> jfc
...

Please do not be misled by the domain name of http://rfc3066.org/review.htm
That site is not affiliated with the ltru WG or the ietf-languages at iana.org
mailing list that performs the language tag review function described in RFC 3066.
I think prospective reviewers' time would be much better spent looking at
the actual documents under WG last call, rather than trying to make sense of
the stuff at  http://rfc3066.org/review.htm

The documents under WG last call are
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-registry-09.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-initial-02.txt

We'd prefer to have your comments on the documents themselves,
rather than reactions to Jefsey's sometimes over-heated polemic.

Randy, ltru co-chair




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf