Re: Seeking reviewers for language tag registry docs in WG last call

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

Hi guys,

Until the WG has consensus, can you keep the discussion on
the WG list?

When there is draft ready for IETF Last Call, we can discuss
it here.

Thanks

    Brian

JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
> On 02:45 15/07/2005, Randy Presuhn said:
>
> > Please do not be misled by the domain name of 
> > http://rfc3066.org/review.htm
> > That site is not affiliated with the ltru WG or the 
> > ietf-languages at iana.org
> > mailing list that performs the language tag review function described 
> > in RFC 3066.
>
>
> This is right. There are two doctrines.
> - an exclusive one: to have a new RFC restricting the possibilities of 
> RFC 3066 in term of language support
> - an inclusive one: to keep RFC 3066 as a flexible base for innovation, 
> and to accep the Draft in parallel
>
> > I think prospective reviewers' time would be much better spent looking at
> > the actual documents under WG last call, rather than trying to make 
> > sense of
> > the stuff at  http://rfc3066.org/review.htm
>
>
> The "stuff" concerns considerations on IETF/ISO/UN relative 
> authoritativeness, standard disclaimer on political aspects inovlved in 
> multilingualism, compatibility between the IANA structure and ISO 
> Registry standards, need of retro-compatibility with new propositions, etc.
>
> During a WGLC all the last-call issues must be addressed by the WG. This 
> is for me the only way to clarify these points while waiting the WG 
> Charter to be analysed.
>
> > The documents under WG last call are
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-registry-09.txt
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-initial-02.txt
> >
> > We'd prefer to have your comments on the documents themselves,
> > rather than reactions to Jefsey's sometimes over-heated polemic.
>
>
> ??? the question is to know if the general points _not_ mentionned into 
> the Draft should be added to it, or belong to a separate Framework 
> document?
>
> Very dull and practical.
> jfc 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf