Re: Test version of the Parking Area

[Bill Fenner <fenner at research.att.com>]

>Yes.  And what's the idea ?

It's the IETF's statement about having approved the documents, as opposed
to the RFC Editor's statement about having the documents in the queue.
  
>So far I took e.g. "draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-00.txt",
>removed "draft-" and "-00.txt" resulting in a fragment id.

Unfortunately, whether or not you have to remove the "draft-" depends
on who added the document to the queue and when.  The RFC Editor said
they would be working on getting this consistent but for now it's not
very useful.

>And that's the position of 2234bis within its category
>"non-WG standards track" (chronological).

The primary key on the parking area is simply the date (and I'm
working on other sort orders).

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf