Re: Meeting Locations

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

My expectation is that we'll stick to the pattern of two N American
meetings plus one in another region - but meeting planning is an art,
not a science.

   Brian

Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> There are a couple of helpful data points for many attendees. In my own 
> case, knowing there are two North American meetings planned, or only 
> one, in a given year tells me a lot about budgeting long before a 
> specific location is announced.
>
> Spencer
>
> From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brc at zurich.ibm.com>
>
>
> > Clint,
> >
> > Firstly, please note that this is now part of the IETF Administrative
> > Ditrector's responsibility. I've put him on copy.
> >
> > Second, we all agree that locations should be chosen and announced
> > as early possible.
> >
> > Third, there is a very high probability that IETF65 will be at a
> > US location and we have a host in view - but until that is fully
> > settled I don't think we can say in public.  I'm sure Ray will tell
> > us as soon as possible.
> >
> >     Brian
> >
> > Clint Chaplin wrote:
> >
> > > How far in advance are the locations of IETF meetings determined? Is
> > > there any way to find out what the possible candidates are?
> > >
> > > I'm having to budget travel for the next year, and knowing where IETF
> > > 65 will be held would help me a lot. 
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf