Re: Port numbers and IPv6 (was: I-D

[John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>]

--On Friday, 15 July, 2005 10:31 -0700 Bob Hinden
<bob.hinden at nokia.com> wrote:

> It was for the pragmatic reason of not wanting to redesign IP
> and TCP at the same time.  This would have made the overall
> IPng effort much harder.  At the time, there wasn't a pressing
> need to redesign TCP.  I don't remember any detailed technical
> analysis.

Does this discussion suggest that it is time to start taking a
look at TCPng?  If not now, at some point in the future that we
can anticipate?

(those are questions, not proposals, requests, or statements of
belief)

    john



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf