![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I'm saying that one source system can generate more than 64K IMAP4 sessions. These are systems running various sorts of proxies, so they are in effect hosting many clients at once.
True, but if we are running IPv6 then surely the solution to this problem would be to simply request some number of additional IP address allocations via DHCP?
This is already done in the IPv4 world, it can be done in the IPv6 world.
More than that: the fact that the interface ID namespace in IPv6 is large means that virtual IP addresses are available more or less on demand. I think this is something we really haven't started to exploit yet.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.