Re: Meeting Locations

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>]

On 19-jul-2005, at 16:19, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> > From the IETF side, it permits serious negotiating for site
> > terms and operational efficiencies when a previous site is re-used.
> > Minneapolis has been a useful demonstration of this latter point,  
> > I think.

> Since nobody but Foretec has seen the Minneapolis contracts, we  
> have no idea whether that's true or not.

Any particular reason for this? A general lack of nosiness doesn't  
seem a likely reason, so there must be more to it.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf