![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> From: Dean Anderson <dean at av8.com>
>> Anyway, I hereby propose the IETF Corollary to Godwin's Law: whenever
>> any IETF thread migrates to the subject of spam, it's time to end the
>> thread.
> Does this mean that you think the IETF should disband the ASRG, drop
> all current I-D's relating to spam, and quit working on spam issues?
> ... if Chiappa genuinely thinks the IETF should stop spam work, he
> should say so directly, so as to be clearly understood.
> .. if the IETF is going to work on spam, then occasionally the main IETF
> list will have to discuss the issue
You seem to have missed the word "migrate" in my post.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.