Re: I-D ACTION:draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-02.txt

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

--On fredag, juli 22, 2005 00:27:25 +0200 Brian E Carpenter 
<brc at zurich.ibm.com> wrote:

> > Sam, I would think that the purpose of a Last Call as part of
> > IESG review would primarily be not to evaluate success or
> > failure, but to be sure that the IESG has an opportunity to
> > hear, from the community, about issues of which the IESG members
> > might not be aware.
>
> Then I don't think it's a Last Call in the normal sense.
> It's what we might whimsically call a Request For Comments.
> Seriously, we could call it a Call for Comments.

The IAB has a tradition of issuing "impending publication" notices on their 
architectural guidance documents.

The resulting document is still labelled an IAB document, not an IETF 
consensus document, but I think the process improves the output (You'd have 
to ask the IAB what they think about the resulting feedback, however).

If something works - copy it :-)


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf