Re: draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt

["James M. Polk" <jmpolk at cisco.com>]

Spencer

Let me add my agreement to this ID as a good idea with balance.

At 05:18 PM 7/26/2005 -0500, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> This draft (available at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-nomcom-term-00.txt)
> does a reasonable job of balancing between current-generation leadership 
> continuity and next-generation leadership development.

I would like to see this ID become one form of guidance for the next NOMCOM 
(as Spencer offers below), acknowledging this effort has not reached 
community consensus to date.


> If I read RFC 3777 correctly, we will be assembling the next NOMCOM very 
> soon ("at least two months before the Third IETF"). So, I'm wondering...
>
> If there is community consensus that this draft proposes something 
> reasonable, would we give the draft to the incoming NOMCOM as part of 
> their instructions and perform a BCP 93 process experiment?
>
> Spencer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


cheers,
James

                                *******************
                Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf