![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> Behalf Of Lakshminath Dondeti > For the 3rd term, I would place the incumbent at the same > level as a new > candidate (assuming neutral feedback on the sitting AD, or even if > he/she is doing a very good job). > > For the 4th term, I would favor new candidates than the > incumbent (so > unless the sitting AD is excellent and the area absolutely needs > him/her, and no one else can do half-the-job etc. :-)). I really think this is missing the point. No matter how good an incumbent they are much less likely to ask questions of the form 'why has this WG existed for over a decade?', 'why isn't it finished?', 'why is nobody using it?' _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.