![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
My 2 cents:
I firmly believe in the "individual" and "voluntary" aspects of IETF attendance. I also belong to both categories; sure my employer pays for the expenses, but nobody forced me to come over. (Come on it's Paris after all, although I have gone to all of the Minneapolis meetings, too. ;)
I represent many things here -- first and foremost I'm an engineer and an end user. Naturally, my interests may be affected by what I do in my "real work". I think that applies to most people here, and I think it would be naive to think otherwise.
And whether or not people mention their affiliate at the mic is a much smaller issue IMO to whether they use their company email account. That is a much more visible and relevant label in IETF work that mostly happens on mailing lists anyway.
Cheers, Aki
That would be fine, if I changed the Newcomer's Orientation :-)
Spencer
Spencer,
However, many people here are not using their 'individual money' to
get here in Paris. Our name badges list our employers (in most cases). I think its a different issue if I come to the mic and say, 'We at the ACME company would like to state, for the record, that we support the foo bar proposal and hope it becomes an official RFC as soon as possible. It doesn't bug me one-way or another if folks state their name & who pays the bills.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.