Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?
From: Bill Fenner <fenner at research.att.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:36:00 +0200
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
Versions: dmail (linux) 2.6d/makemail 2.10

I agree completely; I've had trouble with evening sessions for a
couple of years now, and find this schedule MUCH easier to manage.

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ...
Next by Date: Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?
Previous by thread: Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?
Next by thread: Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.