![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I doubt that this is going to solve anything. All basic project management techniques assume that a project has a deadline and that the people working
We do have deadlines: charters, and external customers (implementors, other SDOs).
I haven't counted the number of times were deadlines were missed this week alone with no consequences.
For example, in a WG I attended this morning, the chair asked a person about a document he promised to write. The person answered that he'd do this in the next month. The chair replied that he said that last time as well. Some laughter followed, but that was the end of it.
This is not quite true: authors are not volunteers in the normal soup-kitchen-volunteer sense. In most cases, authors are paid by their companies to do the work.
I agree. But companies change priorities and with that the time people can spend on ID's. In this case, there is little we can do.
I can see a solution (have get commitment from employers before assigning work to a person) but this will require a major change in the basic way we work.
For example, journals routinely drop editors that don't perform their (unpaid, volunteer) duties.
Yes, but I rarely see this happen in the IETF.
Henk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.