Re: Review panel's role

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>]

Hi, Pekka,

I rarely if ever argue with you about protocol stuff, because you're 
pretty good at protocols, and our process IS a protocol, but I do see 
"returned to clear DISCUSS" items on the IESG telechat agendas. So, I 
bet you're right, but there is running code that we actually DO end up 
sliding to the next telechat, at least some of the time.

Spencer

> Documents don't need to be reballoted [in IESG] to be approved 
> (after being revised). This is up to the nature of the 
> comments/changes and the AD's confidence that the discusses have 
> been addressed to the satisfaction of commenters, and that new text 
> doesn't have issues.
>
> If time is of the essence, the chair or whoever could certainly take 
> up the document from the editor; I've done so personally in a couple 
> of cases.

In all honesty, there are a lot of things that you do that I wish we 
all did, and this is one of them :-)

Spencer 



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf