Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"

To: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com>
Subject: Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 12:26:04 +0300
Cc: IETF General Discussion Mailing List <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <1123233557.5166.21.camel@unknown.hamachi.org>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <90A9AE46-BEB2-4A08-BEA0-65964256574B@muada.com> <1123233557.5166.21.camel@unknown.hamachi.org>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)

Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

While the availability and stability of the IETF infrastructure is important, an engineering organization which declines to "eat its own dog food" sends a message about its suitability for widespread deployment.

Agreed.

--Jari


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- "IETF servers aren't for testing"
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld

Prev by Date: Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"
Next by Date: Re: IETF63 network shutdown at noon today
Previous by thread: Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"
Next by thread: Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.