Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?




Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <20050803104444.GC16624 at login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Tim Chown writes:

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Joerg Ott wrote:

What do other people think?

Add an extra 15 mins for lunch, it makes it so less 'rushed'.


That would be a very good idea.

Dare I say that lunch expands to fill the time available?

The problem with expanding lunch time is that something else
has to contract. I'm not sure it's practical. The GGF has tried
providing box lunches once or twice, but the quality and choice
left much (very much) to be desired.

    Brian


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.