Re: Myths of the IESG: Reading documents is the problem

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>]

--On tirsdag, august 09, 2005 16:33:46 -0400 John C Klensin 
<john-ietf at jck.com> wrote:

> And the notion of an AD who has contributed
> technically to a WG in some significant way then pushing back
> during IESG review if the WG reaches some other conclusion is
> pretty close to intolerable.  Changing the review model would,
> presumably, clear that situation up in a hurry.

Only if it does more than just replace "AD" with "reviewer" in the above 
sentence.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf