IPv6 DNS resolvers issue (Re: Why have we gotten away from running code?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 DNS resolvers issue (Re: Why have we gotten away from running code?)



Since nobody's mentioned the draft name yet, and we generally tell people "go read the drafts"....

 draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-06.txt

Or - "there are 3 options. We can't pick one".

The document was approved by the IESG in July (but seems to be waiting for an IESG note).

                     Harald

--On torsdag, august 11, 2005 16:09:54 +0200 Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu at motorola.com> wrote:

ljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 11-aug-2005, at 11:22, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

However, what may well be missing in the mix
is input from people who actually deploy and operate our stuff, and
live with its limitations and quirks every day. We need to understand
the indirect consequences of our choices: not "can it be coded and  will
it interoperate?" but "will it drive service providers and users
crazy?"

Lack of a way to configure DNS resolvers automatically in IPv6 continues to drive me crazy.

I'm not sure I get it... DHCP distributes DNS resolvers, right? I'm not sure whether the DHCPv4 can distribute DNS IPv6 resolver addresses or is that restricted to DHCPv6. Would be nice if both did, just like both dig/v4 and dig/v6 return both v4 and v6 addresses. I think PPP over IPv6 doesn't do it.





_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.