![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Aug 17, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 17-aug-2005, at 15:03, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
You can ask some pointed questions using RFC 4084 ("exactly which of these descriptions applies to your service, and please show me in the contract where you are allowed to change your service without notice"). But I suspect that even free copies of RFC 1958, 2775, 3234 and 4084 will not be enough to convince them.
Just to be sure: what were talking about is that when a customer gets up in the morning and connects to www.ietf.org they get www.advertising-down-your-throat.de instead, right?
Maybe a nice lawsuit will do the trick. They are assuming the identities of others. That can't be legal.
regards
marcM.
-- "If women didn't exist, all the money in the world would have no meaning."
Les Enfants Terribles www.let.de
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.