Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey

[john.loughney at kolumbus.fi]

That question stymied me, so I just selected "No change."

John

-- original message --
Subject:	Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey
From:	Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
Date:		08/17/2005 3:26 pm

Spencer Dawkins wrote:

> Would you prefer longer meetings or shorter meetings?
> Shorter meetings with more overlaps
> No change
> Longer meetings with fewer overlaps
>
> means! I'm answering it, assuming that it refers to the one-hour 
> sessions that sometimes get doubled-up into two-hour sessions, but if 
> you mean something else, please let us know.

I interpreted it as having a short IETF meeting (e.g. mon-thu) but with lots
of parallel WG meetings vs. longer IETF meeting (e.g. sun-fri) but with less
parallel WG meetings.

So I guess that just shows how people have a different understanding
of what was being asked.

--Jari


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf