Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey

[Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas at uninett.no>]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:35:44PM +0200, john.loughney at kolumbus.fi wrote:
> That question stymied me, so I just selected "No change."

I thought that was clear.

My problem is what "herring bone" seating layout is. I don't understand
why the question is asked either. Why is it important whether people
attended those sessions?

Stig

> 
> John
> 
> -- original message --
> Subject:	Re: IETF 63 On-line Survey
> From:	Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
> Date:		08/17/2005 3:26 pm
> 
> Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> 
> > Would you prefer longer meetings or shorter meetings?
> > Shorter meetings with more overlaps
> > No change
> > Longer meetings with fewer overlaps
> >
> > means! I'm answering it, assuming that it refers to the one-hour 
> > sessions that sometimes get doubled-up into two-hour sessions, but if 
> > you mean something else, please let us know.
> 
> I interpreted it as having a short IETF meeting (e.g. mon-thu) but with lots
> of parallel WG meetings vs. longer IETF meeting (e.g. sun-fri) but with less
> parallel WG meetings.
> 
> So I guess that just shows how people have a different understanding
> of what was being asked.
> 
> --Jari
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf