![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Ed,
The IETF's publisher is the RFC Editor, so they maintain search pages etc. at http://www.rfc-editor.org
Try http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html for generic search Try http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html for document categories
Oh, and for documents awaiting RFC publication, try http://rtg.ietf.org:8080/Test/parking
[More generally: yes, the IETF web site needs a general clean up for useability and organization. The Tools team has this on their list.]
Brian
I guess I should say that wouldn't it be more professional if it were easier to navigate to IETF document from the IETF web pages?
As someone who's been around a while, it's hard to "on a dime" find a reference without having to build up my own repository. As I have changed employers over the years I have left behind old repositories on the equipment I no longer am permitted to use.
I can imagine it's even harder for newcomers to navigate.
What can't: http://www.ietf.org/documents/bcp/bcp102.txt be all that is needed, with links to Documents and then BCP be plainly visible on the web site?
BTW, thanks to the references to 2026. I had forgotten there was more than than just the RFC categories and standards track levels.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.