![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
On Aug 17, 2005, at 22:24, Michael Richardson wrote:Right now, to attend a meeting in Europe next summer (fares to Europe in the summer are always high, and planning family is most difficult during the summer) I would need to know by September of this year.
To attend a meeting outside of north america in 2006, I'd need to know the Fall 2006 meeting location by October of 2005 to make sure that i'd have budget.
it was a great step to fix the meeting dates far in advance; it allows us to block the time in our calendars. I agree with Michael that for early travel planning, fixing the location long before the meeting would also be very good. Not only continent, but also city.
As I understand it - and please correct me if this is wrong - it's because hosts don't really like to commit to hosting meetings far off in the future. Given that we've had successful meetings in the past with no hosts - do we really depend on hosts still? How much would the registration increase if there were no hosts? The additional cost might easily be offset by lower airfare and cheaper hotel rates.
Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja at darkwing.uoregon.edu GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.