![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Grenville,
All part of a web site that grew little by little...
That's why the tools team is taking a global look at it.
Let's see. You go
IESG Activities/Tools team and it tells you how to write to them.
Brian
Bob Braden wrote: [..]
The RFC series includes more than IETF standards. We believe that providing access to the RFCs is a natural function for the RFC Editor... in fact, we have been doing it for 30+ years.
RFC Editor/bb
I think the problem is (and I've wondered about this oddity previously too)
that the *IETF* main website should have a *direct* link to "the RFC
search engine". The bottom link that says "RFC Editor" is not an
obvious decision path for a casual www.ietf.org user, and the main "RFC Pages" link only directly offers a lookup for people who
know the RFC number they're after. Again, not great for casual
(or can't-remember-what-RFC-had-this-word) users.
I don't think the real question is about the RFC Editor site's layout. It's about why the IETF main page itself doesn't provide a link directly to a/the search engine for RFCs.
cheers, gja
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.