Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Julian Mehnle <julian at mehnle.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> not speaking for anyone but myself.....
>
> one matter of principle:
>
> are you of the opinion that the IESG should try to police which
> experiments get run on the Internet by refusing to publish RFCs
> documenting possibly-conflicting experments?

Let me phrase it this way: the IESG should not sanction conflicting 
experiments by publishing conflicting specifications, especially not if 
those specifications were explicitly requested by the IESG as individual 
submissions after the demise of a working group that had previously 
already shown consensus on not allowing that conflict which has only 
_now_ become a reality in one of the individual submissions.

Julian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDDlonwL7PKlBZWjsRAiYZAJ0eTdjybYoeUHDPenw2bAJ0J1+rdQCgglwP
j9QcH7h68l1nDcrGH7MvxIs=
=eEqD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf