Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

[Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com>]

Hi Stuart,

Although implementaitons are not strictly required for Proposed 
Standard publication, I do think that it is interesting to know 
whether people have implemented, or intend to implement our standards.

I have received a couple of private confirmations that LLMNR is 
implemented in WinCE 5.0.  I have also been told that it has been 
implemented by ETRI, as documented in the following paper:

http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~jjeong/publications/international-conference/icact2004-jaehoon.pdf

Margaret

At 6:52 PM -0700 8/25/05, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
> > I don't see anything in RFC 2026 criteria that hinges on whether
> > Microsoft intends to implement a protocol.
>
> Is doesn't have to be Microsoft.
>
> Is there *anyone* out there who has implemented this, or plans to?
>
> Or am I just being old-fashioned in thinking that the idea behind a
> protocol specified in an RFC is that someone somewhere might implement it?
>
> Stuart Cheshire <cheshire at apple.com>
>  * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc.
>  * www.stuartcheshire.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf