Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard


On Aug 26, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: 
 The most important criteria is
the fact that the specification is NOT controlled by any given private
entity.


is that enought  to show thats not "proprietary" ?

http://www.macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2004/08/31/osx_java.html
http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/fl/research/accessgrid/bonjour-py/bonjour- py.html
http://sourceforge.net/projects/swig/
http://rubyforge.org/projects/dnssd/

cheers

have a great day

P.S. can you show me some free LLMNR implementations?

--
"Wer also allgemeine Aufklärung verbreitet, verschafft zugleich eben dadurch allgemeine wechselseitige Sicherheit, und allgemeine Aufklärung und Sicherheit machen Fürsten und Staaten entbehrlich. Oder wozu braucht man sie sodann?"

Les Enfants Terribles
www.let.de


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.