Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

Russ Allbery wrote:
...
> I think your criteria doesn't survive logical scrutiny.  If other people
> have access to the standard, can implement the standard, and can build on
> the standard to create a newer revision of it, I can't imagine what
> definition of "proprietary" you're using that would apply.

But mDNS is not on the standards track and LLMNR is proposed to be
on the standards track. That, I think, is why Stuart has raised the issue.

As long as they are Internet-Drafts they all have the same status, work
in progress, except that LLMNR has gained WG consensus.

   Brian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf