Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02


On Aug 25, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

In this case, the two experiments interpret the same codepoints in the
DNS in subtly different ways.

A mail-sending domain indicates that it is participating by publishing
certain DNS RR's.
Crucially, a mail-sending domain cannot opt in to the SPF experiment
without also opting in to the senderid experiment.  This renders any
claimed results of either experiment suspect.

If this is the source of the conflict, then BOTH experiments should not use the v=spf1 records.

-andy

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.