Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

To: Marshall Eubanks <tme at multicasttech.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:21:06 -0400
Cc: Stuart Cheshire <cheshire at apple.com>, Margaret Wasserman <margaret at thingmagic.com>, Bill Manning <bmanning at karoshi.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <web-2951190@multicasttech.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <web-2951190@multicasttech.com>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)

I am perhaps just being slow and dim-witted after minor surgery, but why
should a protocol that no-one will use be standards track ?

Why should we accept a few (mostly axe-grinding) peoples' assertions that no-one will use it?

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
  - From: bmanning

References:
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Marshall Eubanks

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.