Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Keith Moore wrote:
>
> I think DKIM is fixable, but if it stays in its current form it will only
> delay adoption of effective anti-phishing and anti-spam solutions by a few
> more years.
Has anyone published a description of an "effective anti-phishing and
anti-spam solution"?
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
