Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards

Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards

Mark Baugher wrote:

I don't necessarily see the two needing to be combined so closely.

perhaps not, but if DKIM doesn't address either phishing, spam, or viruses, and it doesn't authenticate content authorship, what good is it?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards
  - From: Mark Baugher

References:
- RE: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards
  - From: Tony Finch
- Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards
  - From: Mark Baugher

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.