 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > But I do not believe that SPF and Sender-ID conflict in any > way whatsoever and this was accepted by the WG What you believe is your business, but this was never accepted by the WG, because it's plain wrong, see also reference [12] in the appeal: http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/senderid-appeal.htm#r12 The complete thread (starting in mxcomp) is very interesting: http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/thread=8111 Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.